The Complex Communication Network of Mycorrhizal Fungi Animals

I used to think mycorrhizal fungi were basically just underground plumbing for trees.

Turns out, the reality is so much weirder—and messier—than that simplistic view. These fungal networks, which connect roughly 90% of land plants through their root systems, don’t just shuttle water and nutrients around like some botanical subway system. They’re actively communicating, sharing resources in ways that look almost deliberate, and here’s the thing: some animals have figured out how to tap into this system. Researchers at the University of British Columbia discovered that certain soil-dwelling invertebrates can actually detect chemical signals moving through mycorrhizal networks, essentially eavesdropping on plant-fungus conversations. The springtails—those tiny, jumping arthropods you’ve probably never noticed in your garden—seem to use fungal chemical signatures to locate nutrient-rich patches of soil. It’s like they’ve hacked the forest’s internet, except the internet is made of living threads and predates human civilization by, oh, roughly 450 million years give or take.

Wait—maybe I’m getting ahead of myself here. The basic mycorrhizal relationship is straightforward enough: fungi colonize plant roots, extending microscopic filaments called hyphae into the surrounding soil. Plants get enhanced nutrient uptake, fungi recieve carbohydrates. Symbiosis 101.

How Animals Intercept Underground Chemical Highways Without Anyone Really Noticing Until Recently

But animals complicate everything, as they tend to do. Small mammals like voles don’t just eat mycorrhizal fungi—they actively seek out specific species, then disperse the spores across the landscape in their feces, essentially acting as mobile spore distribution systems. Dr. Suzanne Simard’s team at UBC (yes, the same university I mentioned earlier, I guess they’re really into this) tracked how Douglas squirrels preferentially cache fungi from networks connected to older trees, which produce more nutrient-dense fruiting bodies. The squirrels can’t possibly understand the underground architecture they’re navigating, yet their foraging patterns suggest they’re responding to signals that originate in the mycorrhizal web itself. Chemical volatiles, maybe. Honestly, we don’t know for sure.

The truffle example is even stranger.

European wild boars root through forest floors with what looks like random enthusiasm, but thermal imaging studies revealed they’re targeting specific hyphal clusters—not just any fungal growth, but nodes where multiple plant roots intersect with dense fungal mats. These intersection points produce truffles with higher concentrations of androstenol, a compound that mimics boar pheromones, which feels almost manipulative when you think about it too hard. The fungi have effectively evolved to smell like sexy pig to ensure spore dispersal. Nature’s full of these exhausting ironies: a fungus that can’t move convinces a 200-pound mammal to do its bidding by hijacking its mating signals. Meanwhile, the plants connected to that fungal network are simultaneously feeding it, depending on it, and—based on recent isotope studies from the Max Planck Institute—potentially starving competitor plants by redirecting fungal services away from them.

When the Network Becomes a Neighborhood Watch System (and Sometimes a Weapons Platform)

I’ve seen the data on defense signaling, and it’s frankly unsettling. When aphids attack one plant, mycorrhizal networks can transmit alarm chemicals to neighboring plants within 24 hours, triggering preemptive defense responses. But here’s where animals reenter the picture: parasitic wasps that prey on aphids have been observed patrolling plants connected to recently-attacked neighbors more frequently than isolated plants. They’re definately reading fungal-transmitted intel. A 2019 study in Ecology Letters tracked wasp behavior across fragmented networks and found search patterns that only make sense if the insects are detecting volatile compounds released by forewarned plants—compounds whose production was triggered by fungal signaling, not direct aphid contact. It’s a game of telephone played through multiple kingdoms of life, and somehow it works often enough to persist across evolutionary time.

Anyway, the whole system feels less like a network and more like a chaotic, multilingual marketplace where nobody’s entirely sure what anyone else is saying, but deals keep getting made.

Dr. Helena Riverside, Wildlife Biologist and Conservation Researcher

Dr. Helena Riverside is a distinguished wildlife biologist with over 14 years of experience studying animal behavior, ecosystem dynamics, and biodiversity conservation across six continents. She specializes in predator-prey relationships, migration patterns, and species adaptation strategies in changing environments, having conducted extensive fieldwork in African savannas, Amazon rainforests, Arctic regions, and coral reef ecosystems. Throughout her career, Dr. Riverside has contributed to numerous conservation initiatives and published research on endangered species protection, habitat preservation, and the impact of climate change on wildlife populations. She holds a Ph.D. in Wildlife Biology from Cornell University and is passionate about making complex ecological concepts accessible to nature enthusiasts and advocates for evidence-based conservation strategies. Dr. Riverside continues to bridge science and public education through wildlife documentaries, conservation programs, and international research collaborations.

Rate author
Fauna Fondness
Add a comment